1.
There are three levels of classroom discussions.
The first level is teacher to teacher. For this level, teachers are
collaborating with each other. They discuss when the best opportunities are to
work together, they create effective assessments, and discuss ways in which the
students could be learning more effectively or parts of the project that they
may be confused about that they need more clarification on. The second level is
student to student. These discussions occur between students, where things such
as the learning experience, team planning, team organization, project
challenges, and effective feedback as discussed upon and given. The third level
of classroom discussion is teacher to student. These could be whole class discussions,
group discussions or even individual student discussions in which the teacher
and the students discuss how the project is going and where changes might need
to be made for success.
2.
There are four types of questions for checking
in. Each type helps the teacher to gain more information on the all the
different teams, which are working in many directions, at many different
speeds. The first type is procedural which can answer questions such as: “Are
we staying on schedule?” and “Do we have the right materials available?” The
second type is teamwork which can answer questions such as: “How are team
members getting along?” and “Is one student carrying too much of the load for
the whole team?” The third question type
is understanding, which can answer questions such as: “Have you ever thought
about…?” and “Have you considered this research?” The final type of question is
self-assessment, which can answer questions such as: “What is something
challenging about this project?” and “What is frustrating about this project?”
3.
There are many benefits to students when they
optimize the use of technology within their project. These benefits include: researching
the ultimate learning goals, helping them stayed organized, being able to
connect to outside experts effectively, and having ready access to whenever
they need/want to use the technology.
4.
Teamwork is one 21st century skill
that can make or break a project. Teachers need to pay close attention to team dynamics.
The teamwork skills the students learn during these big projects will serve
them well for years to come. One good idea is to have each team develop a team
contract. The contract would list out team members’ roles and responsibilities and
list out consequences that will occur if someone does not live up to the
expectation set. Having the peer pressure and standard set really helps all
students to stay motivated into doing well on the project.
5.
In relating to our school brochure project, we
want to make sure that plenty of classroom discussion is happening. Classroom discussion
between the teachers, students, and teachers/students is essential to get everyone
on the same page and for voices to be heard. We also want to make sure that
there are plenty of ways we as teachers are “checking in.” We want to keep in
mind each side of the project, procedural, teamwork, understanding, and
self-assessment and making sure we are excelling in every area. We also want
out students to be using the technology available at an optimum level, helping
them stay organized, engaged and collaborating with their peers and other
experts. Finally, we also want to make sure each team is operating smoothly and
efficiently, making sure everyone is getting along and treating each other
respectfully.
Hi Krista,
ReplyDeleteI love how you stated that classroom discussion is essential so everyone is on the same page and voices are heard. I feel more often than not, students will have great ideas or input, but a teacher will never know because they were never heard.
Krista,
ReplyDeleteYou did a great job of describing the different types of questions that teachers should ask the students throughout the project. By making sure that everything is running smoothly in the project, it involves checking in with the knowledge and academic performance and also the effectiveness of the team.